AIAI is used to generate this content, the voices are synthetic and belong to no real person, and AI can get things wrong.
Mismatched mates: 125x heavier females, molt-timed mating, deleted immune genes
0:005:09
Daybrain is becoming an iOS app: control the content, recurring shows, playlists and more.

Transcript

Mismatched mates: 125x heavier females, molt-timed mating, deleted immune genes

Deep-sea anglerfish males bite into their mates and physically fuse with them, dissolving their own organs until they're just a parasite hanging off her body. Hey, I'm Salt. I'm Grace. Humans look pretty similar across the sexes, you know, compared to the rest of the animal world. But there are animals out there living in realities where males and females look like entirely different species.

We should start with spiders, because they push this to the absolute limit. A January 2020 review by Matjaž Kuntner and Jonathan Coddington looked at giant wood spiders. The females are, on average, 125 times heavier than the males. Wait — what? Yeah.

It's driven by fecundity selection. The biological pressure to produce thousands of eggs in a really harsh environment means the female just keeps getting bigger and bigger to maximize her carrying capacity, while the male stays tiny because his only job is to find her. Okay, but how does a male that tiny actually approach her? Spiders eat each other. If she's 125 times his size, um, he's just a snack.

It's a huge risk. They get cannibalized a lot. But researchers found a behavioural workaround. The tiny males often seek out immature females that haven't fully developed their predatory instincts yet. So he catches her before she knows she should eat him.

Exactly. They-they time it so they mate right as the female is molting. Her exoskeleton is soft, her fangs are soft, so she physically cannot bite him. That's wild. But we see extreme gaps in the other direction too, right?

Where the male is the giant. We do. And it usually involves intense, body-slamming combat over territory. A March 2024 study in Nature Communications found that northern elephant seals have the most extreme male-biased size gap in mammals. The bulls weigh up to 3.

2 times more than the females. You see footage of these guys on the beach and they look like cargo vans just throwing themselves at each other. Ha, they're just walls of blubber fighting for harems. And the physical cost of maintaining that bulk is severe. A March 2023 study tracked about 14,000 southern elephant seals.

To grow five times larger than the females, the young males have to take huge risks foraging in dangerous waters. What kind of toll does that take on them? After age eight, their annual survival rate drops to just 50 percent. Get out. It's true.

They push their bodies so hard to get big enough to compete that they just eat themselves into an early grave. Most of them never even win a harem. They just die trying to bulk up. Does being the biggest always guarantee control, though? Like, what about gorillas?

Because silverbacks are huge, but they live in complex groups. Right, we used to think size was everything for them too. Silverbacks are twice the size of females. But an August 2025 study in Animal Behaviour showed a very different dynamic. Up to 88 percent of female mountain gorillas in multi-male groups manage to physically overpower at least one subordinate male.

So even at half the weight, they just throw their weight around to push these junior males in line. They team up. The sheer size of the silverback matters for defending the group, but the social order below him is — well, the females run it. Huh. But if we're talking extreme physical differences, Grace, we have to go back to the anglerfish.

The deep sea changes all the rules, Salt. You mentioned in the beginning that they fuse together. How does a vertebrate bypass tissue rejection? I-I mean, if I get a kidney transplant, my immune system attacks it. How do they just merge blood streams?

This is the wildest part. A July 2020 genomic study in the journal Science figured out how they tolerate permanent physical fusion. They shed critical parts of their adaptive immune system. Like, they just turn it off? They lose the genes entirely.

Things like aicda, rag1, and rag2 are, uh, just gone from their DNA. Seriously? The male bites the female, their blood vessels mesh, and because he lacks those specific immune genes to fight her cells off, he-he just merges into her and they become one shared circulatory system for the rest of their lives. It's a huge sacrifice. He loses his eyes, his fins, his organs.

He kind of just becomes a parasite producing sperm. The immune system compromise is what allows the physical fusion to happen without killing them both. I can't even picture that. So they just don't have an adaptive immune system at all? For those specific pathways, no.

It challenges a lot of what we thought we knew about evolutionary compromises. You'd think giving up your immune defenses would just leave you wide open to disease. But if you live in the deep ocean, you know, I guess the chance of finding a mate is so low that you sort of have to hang on forever when you finally bump into one. We're left to wonder whether sacrificing fundamental survival systems like the immune system for reproductive success is an evolutionary dead end, or the ultimate masterclass in adaptation. Thanks a lot for listening to Daybrain.

Audio episode, 5:09. Generated with Daybrain using AI; the voices are synthetic and belong to no real person.